Macular Degeneration Cure Research By Carlyle Coash Share In this 2015 study published in the journal Clinical Ophthalmology we see a small study with 15 people with both wet and dry macular degeneration. If you are considering a program utilizing microcurrent stimulation you will be pleased with the results shown in this study. Only microcurrent stimulation was used in this study and treatments were only done once a week. Still, some improvement in vision was seen, mostly in those in those study participants with dry macular degeneration.We were using a frequency specific microcurrent stimulator. In the few studies published using frequency specific microcurrent stimulation, the results have been worse or at best the same as those using the MicroStim 100 or the earlier MicroStim 400 professional unit. You will pay a great deal more for a frequency specific unit but will not see better results than you can expect with a MicroStim 100 series.What did the study show:More people showed improvement then decline over the course of the study. Modern models for treatment programs that include microcurrent stimulation also include various other therapies to improve outcomes. With these more robust programs a higher percentage of people show improvement and very few people actually showed decline, justifying the additional effort beyond treatment with microcurrent stimulation alone. NOTE: Click on the image of the article to open it in another window where you can read it online. Some files may not be available for download for copyright reasons.
About TestimonialsWe follow the FTC guidelines concerning use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising. Please be aware of the following: testimonials appearing on the site are actually received via letters, text, audio or video submission. They are individual experiences, reflecting real life experiences of those who have used our products and/or services in some way or another. However, they are individual results and results do vary. In any case studies, testimonials, examples, and illustrations cannot guarantee that the user will achieve similar results. In fact, your results may vary significantly and factors such as your location, personal effort and many other circumstances may and will cause results to vary. There are laws governing patient confidentiality, so we cannot use names or identifying information other than a client number associated with this testimonial. The testimonials displayed (text, audio and/or video) are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. Some have been shortened. In other words, not the whole message received from a testimonial writer is displayed, when it was lengthy and not the whole testimonial seemed relevant for the general public. BetterEyeHealth.com is not responsible for any of the opinions or comments posted to our site. BetterEyeHealth.com is not a forum for testimonials, however we provide testimonials as a means for customers to share their experiences with one another. To prevent against abuse, all testimonials appear after they have been reviewed by the management of BetterEyeHealth.com. BetterEyeHealth.com does not share the opinions, views or commentary of any testimonials on the site, and are directly the views of the reviewer. Additionally, these testimonials are not intended to make claims that these products can be used to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate or prevent any disease. These claims have not been clinically proven or evaluated by the FDA. BetterEyeHealth.com may be reached at support at bettereyehealth.com
