Share Does It Help To Join A Clinical Trial? By Damon Miller When you read about research into new treatments for conditions like macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease, you may hear about clinical trials and wonder if these are something that might help you. We discuss the long history of clinical trials for the treatment of eye disease. Our general recommendation based on long experience is to not rush to join any clinical trial, for two reasons. One is that almost all of the new treatments being researched involve significant risks. Until there is good data that the treatment offers real and lasting benefits that far outweigh the risks, don’t be in a hurry to try it. Second, while you are waiting for medical research to find a magic bullet that will reverse serious degenerative eye disease, you can start a proven program of treatment where over 90% of people see lasting improvements in their vision. Link to Better Eye Health Program™
Share Results of the Application of the Method of Transcutaneous Electrostimulation of the Visual System in Ophthalmology By Carlyle Coash If you have a problem with your optic nerve you’ll be very interested in knowing that the therapies that we use, mostly for the treatment of retinal disease in the United States have proven very effective in treating optic nerve disease. Much of this research has, and continues to come from Russia and other parts of the former Soviet Union. This […]
Share Restoration of Vision After Optic Nerve Lesions with Non-Invasive Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation: A Clinical Observational Study By Carlyle Coash This is from Brain Stimulation Journal published by Elsevier. It is from work done by the Polenov Russian Neurosurgical Institute in St. Petersburg Russia, as well as the Mechnikov Medical Academy Department of Neurology in St Petersburg Russia and the Institute of Medical Psychology at Otto von Guericke University in Magdeburg Germany. NOTE: Click on […]
Share Repetitive Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation in Optic Neuropathy By Carlyle Coash This is an article published in NeuroRehabilitation by IOS Press. it is from work done at the Otto Von Guericke University of Magdeburg, Institute of Medical Psychology and EBS Technologies. NOTE: Click on the image of the article to open it in another window where you can read it online. Some files may not be […]
Share Non-Invasive Transorbital Alternating Current Stimulation Improves Subjective Visual Functioning and Vision-Related Quality Of Life in Optic Neuropathy By Carlyle Coash Printed in the Brain Stimulation Journal published by Elsevier. University of Magdeburg, Institute of Medical Phychology – Magdeburg Germany. As well as EBS Technologies and the Department of Neurology, Charie Campus Mitte – Berlin Germany. NOTE: Click on the image of the article to open it in another window where you can read it online. […]
Share Non-Invasive Alternating Current Stimulation Improves Vision in Optic Neuropathy By Carlyle Coash A research paper published in the Journal for Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience from IOS Press. Part of work done at the Institute of Medical Psychology in Magdeburg Germany. Also with EBS Technologies, the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases and the Carl Von Ossietzky University Institute of Psychology – Department of Experimental Psychology. NOTE: Click on […]
Share Nutritional Supplementation, Electrical Stimulation and Age Related Macular Degeneration By Carlyle Coash This paper from 1993 presents data from clinicians using a program very similar to be program pioneered by Grace Halloran PhD. Leland Michael,O.D. came to California to learn what Grace was doing and it was from her that he learned about the use of microcurrent stimulation. The only unit available in 1993 was the Electro-Acuscope, […]
Share Macular Degeneration Treatment with Nutrients and Micro Current Electricity By Carlyle Coash This paper from 1998 presents data from clinicians using a program very similar to the program pioneered by Grace Halloran PhD. This study follows and continues another study we present elsewhere from 1993 by Dr. Michael and Dr. Allen. In this study, there was some refinement of the supplement protocol, and people were treated with […]
Share Microcurrent Stimulation in the Treatment of Dry and Wet Macular Degeneration By Carlyle Coash In this 2015 study published in the journal Clinical Ophthalmology we see a small study with 15 people with both wet and dry macular degeneration. If you are considering a program utilizing microcurrent stimulation you will be pleased with the results shown in this study. Only microcurrent stimulation was used in this study and treatments […]
Share Grace’s Early Notes Regarding Her Program Touch for Health By Carlyle Coash This is a copy of some of Grace’s early notes regarding her work with eye disease and her Touch for Health program. This is her description of some of the aspects of the program. NOTE: Click on the image of the article to open it in another window where you can read it online. Some […]
About TestimonialsWe follow the FTC guidelines concerning use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising. Please be aware of the following: testimonials appearing on the site are actually received via letters, text, audio or video submission. They are individual experiences, reflecting real life experiences of those who have used our products and/or services in some way or another. However, they are individual results and results do vary. In any case studies, testimonials, examples, and illustrations cannot guarantee that the user will achieve similar results. In fact, your results may vary significantly and factors such as your location, personal effort and many other circumstances may and will cause results to vary. There are laws governing patient confidentiality, so we cannot use names or identifying information other than a client number associated with this testimonial. The testimonials displayed (text, audio and/or video) are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. Some have been shortened. In other words, not the whole message received from a testimonial writer is displayed, when it was lengthy and not the whole testimonial seemed relevant for the general public. BetterEyeHealth.com is not responsible for any of the opinions or comments posted to our site. BetterEyeHealth.com is not a forum for testimonials, however we provide testimonials as a means for customers to share their experiences with one another. To prevent against abuse, all testimonials appear after they have been reviewed by the management of BetterEyeHealth.com. BetterEyeHealth.com does not share the opinions, views or commentary of any testimonials on the site, and are directly the views of the reviewer. Additionally, these testimonials are not intended to make claims that these products can be used to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate or prevent any disease. These claims have not been clinically proven or evaluated by the FDA. BetterEyeHealth.com may be reached at support at bettereyehealth.com
