All Podcast Nutrition Supplements By Carlyle Coash Share BETTER EYE HEALTH PODCAST - EPISODE 6Podcast: Download (Duration: 8:42 — 15.9MB)Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | RSS | More Since the 1950s, ophthalmologists have done the following: (1.) When they make a new diagnosis of macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa or Stargardt disease, they tell the person that they are very sorry, but they have nothing to offer, and their vision will continue to deteriorate. (2.) Before the person leaves the doctors office, they are given a bottle of eye vitamins and told, “Here, take these, they may slow down your vision loss.” The AREDS study (age-related eye disease study) was funded by a vitamin manufacturer to allow them to advertise their vitamins as a support for people with macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, Stargardt disease and other serious eye problems. You need vitamins, and you can do SO much better than the products marketed as AREDS vitamins. We describe the colloidal vitamins we recommend, and why we like them.As always you will find the link to the Podcast, as well as the full transcript. You can also download a PDF of the transcript down at the bottom the page. Enjoy! Using the Better Eye Health Protocol: Liquid Vitamins TRANSCRIPT FOR BEH PODCAST EPISODE 6Dr. Miller: I just want to talk about the different supplements we use in our basic protocol. We won’t talk about them all today; we’ll do a little talk on each one over the next few weeks. This leads into one question, where somebody was asking about the AREDS formula. AREDS is an acronym, it’s a term that refers to the program of supplements that ophthalmologists recommend and it stands for Age Related Eye Disease Study. For a number of reasons, I am not really fond of the AREDS formulas. Almost the entire study was funded by the Bausch and Lomb company, who had bought a brand name vitamin called Ocuvite. Ocuvite came on the market in the 1960’s when there was some research, originally out of Israel that people with macular degeneration tended to be low in zinc. The other kind of research found that giving some zinc supplementation to people with degenerative eye diseases, especially macular degeneration, seemed to be useful in slowing the progress of the disease. And so, Ocuvite was a so, so multivitamin with extra zinc. There was a lot of extra Zinc in Ocuvite. Patient’s doctors would tell them what doctors tell people now: “there’s really nothing you can do, but here take these vitamins”. Doctors would hand out samples of it and people would take the multivitamin very diligently. There was almost 90 mg of Zinc in the Ocuvite back in the 60’s. After many years of diligently taking the vitamin, their eye doctor had told them to take, people found out, that too much zinc gives you heart failure by damaging your heart. This damage is mainly because zinc displaces Copper and Manganese and other critical elements. So a lot of people started showing up in emergency rooms in the 70’s with heart failure, and they traced it back to their years of taking Ocuvite. That’s why you don’t want to overdo the Zinc, or if you do overdo the Zinc, you need to make sure you’re taking extra Copper and Manganese.Ocuvite was kind of the brand name for eye disease vitamins and Bausch and Lomb, when they bought the brand, wanted to be able to market it for eye disease, which meant they had to do some studies. They finally funded this thing called the ARED Study, which a lot of people jokingly call the Ocuvite study. What’s interesting is one of the things about the formula they studied. First of all, it had higher levels of a lot of vitamins than what most doctors were used to prescribing. So it had amounts of vitamin E and vitamin C and Zinc and other things that were well over what the minimum daily requirement or the even the recommended daily allowance. They were far beyond what the minimum was that’s usually recommended. As a result, one of the things the ARED Study did is proved that larger doses of vitamins are safe because nobody got into trouble with the AREDS. The other thing that it did is showed that even a poorly designed, if taken regularly did slow the progression of the disease of macular degeneration. That’s exactly what it sounds like, it slowed the progression. Nobody got better, nobody’s deterioration stopped, but people didn’t get as bad as quickly. So, AREDS is a standard thing that’s recommended now. I don’t like the AREDS because, in general, the ones on the market aren’t very good. If you go back and actually read the ARED Study, what they used in the studies was a far superior product to what is actually marketed as AREDS vitamins. In other words, the stuff on the shelves that you go buy isn’t nearly as good as what they used in the study. So, it’s hard to even compare results there because they were using a custom formulated thing for research and it’s not what ended up being put in the bottles that are on the shelf. And I think you can do much better.Having talked about the AREDS, I just want to say that the next thing we’ll talk about this week are the liquid multivitamins. The reason we use a liquid multivitamin or the reason we recommend one, is that liquids are far better absorbed. The protocol brand that we use is labeled as a liquid multivitamin and mineral supplement. In truth, with any kind of vitamin mineral supplement, there are generally very inadequate amounts of minerals, but when you mix vitamins and minerals in the same preparation, you tend to see the minerals get bound up to the fat soluble vitamins. These vitamins are, vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin E and vitamin K. You really get very little of the minerals out of something like that. Manufacturers do that because people like having a one product thing, everything together in one product whether it’s pills or liquid. But there are some best practices that are recommended for manufactured vitamins and those practices say don’t mix vitamins and minerals in the same product. There’s no harm in having the minerals there, but there is a separate mineral supplement we recommend and we’ll talk about that next week. Coming back to the vitamins we use, the brand in our protocol has worked well, both with eye disease and other things that I treat. The amounts of things are not too high and the form of vitamin A that they use has some beta-keratin in there, but then the other vitamin A is in the form of vitamin A palmitate. We’ll talk more on that a little later.There’s been some research, and a lot of confusion, about the use of vitamin A for anybody with an eye disease, especially Stargardt Disease. But a lot of that data is, I believe, misinterpreted, so we’re writing more about that. There’s going to be some things that we’re going to put out in writing so you can read it because it’s a complex discussion. However, I don’t recommend that people with Stargardt Disease or any other eye disease completely avoid vitamin A. Some doctors get so radical that they say: “not only don’t take supplements with vitamin A, but don’t eat fruits and vegetables, and the thing that makes the vitamin A dangerous is light, so don’t go out in the light”. So now you’re sitting eating potatoes in the dark and it’s not a good bit of advice for health. There is work showing ways to go with this, but I do like the liquid multi-vitamins. They have everything in them, in some cases more than what’s in the ARED Study. I think they’re a far better absorbing product and higher quality. That’s why we go with the protocol liquid multivitamins. It has your basic B vitamins. it’s got antioxidants and that’s the basic vitamin formula that we use. Downloads BETTER EYE HEALTH PODCAST - EPISODE 6DOWNLOAD USING THE BEH PROTOCOL - ORTHO-LIQUID VIT.BETTER EYE HEALTH PODCAST - EPISODE 6DOWNLOAD TRANSCRIPT
About TestimonialsWe follow the FTC guidelines concerning use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising. Please be aware of the following: testimonials appearing on the site are actually received via letters, text, audio or video submission. They are individual experiences, reflecting real life experiences of those who have used our products and/or services in some way or another. However, they are individual results and results do vary. In any case studies, testimonials, examples, and illustrations cannot guarantee that the user will achieve similar results. In fact, your results may vary significantly and factors such as your location, personal effort and many other circumstances may and will cause results to vary. There are laws governing patient confidentiality, so we cannot use names or identifying information other than a client number associated with this testimonial. The testimonials displayed (text, audio and/or video) are given verbatim except for correction of grammatical or typing errors. Some have been shortened. In other words, not the whole message received from a testimonial writer is displayed, when it was lengthy and not the whole testimonial seemed relevant for the general public. BetterEyeHealth.com is not responsible for any of the opinions or comments posted to our site. BetterEyeHealth.com is not a forum for testimonials, however we provide testimonials as a means for customers to share their experiences with one another. To prevent against abuse, all testimonials appear after they have been reviewed by the management of BetterEyeHealth.com. BetterEyeHealth.com does not share the opinions, views or commentary of any testimonials on the site, and are directly the views of the reviewer. Additionally, these testimonials are not intended to make claims that these products can be used to diagnose, treat, cure, mitigate or prevent any disease. These claims have not been clinically proven or evaluated by the FDA. BetterEyeHealth.com may be reached at support at bettereyehealth.com